Inductive Reasoning

From SkepticWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Definition

Inductive Reasoning (as opposed to Deductive Reasoning) is the process of reasoning from many examples to a conclusion. Most practical reasoning, including science, makes extensive use of inductive reasoning in an effort to apply a of specific observations to cover new areas and applications.

For example, an observer might notice that all of the crows in a particular flock (technically, murder) are black, and from that try to infer a general proposition such as "Crows are black." Or, "the sun rises every morning, therefore it will rise tomorrow morning."

From a philosophical position, the problem of induction is that inductive reasoning, while often cogent, rational, and indeed compelling, can never lead to an absolutely valid conclusion. Although I have never seen nor heard of a blue crow, that is no guarantee that I will not find one on my front porch tomorrow.

A specific kind of induction, called mathematical induction, by contrast, is a legitimate and deductively valid method of proving statements about numbers or other objects capable of sequencing.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Related Topics

[edit] References

[edit] Comments

For all contributors:

  • Try to keep the "Definition" as straight and encyclopaedic in style as possible. Use the "Discussion" section for editorialising
  • Use the references section for footnotes to books and other sources
Personal tools