Special pleading

From SkepticWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Definition

Special Pleading is a formal logical fallacy where a participant introduces details by alleging a need to take in special considerations without without proper criticism of the considerations. The most general structure of this argument runs something like the following:

  1. Person A accepts standard(s) S and applies them to others in circumtance(s) C.
  2. Person A is in circumstance(s) C.
  3. Therefore A is exempt from S.

This is a fallacy because s/he claiming that he is exempt from certain principles or standards yet s/he provides no good reason for his exemption.

[edit] Example

Example 1:

Antagonist: God doesn't have to be created by a creator, He is the beginning and the end!

Example 2:

Antagonist: I think that all people who use drugs should be sent to prison.
Protagonist: You defended your sister when she was caught with cocaine; why did you do that?
Antagonist : Well, she's my sister. That's different.

[edit] Exceptions to the Rule

This fallacy violates the Principle of Relevant Difference. This principal states that two people can be treated differently if there is a relevant difference between them. Of course, the principal means that you can treat people differently. Example:

Protagonist: John, you never work, while Michael stay late every day working. he has contributed more to the company in a day than you ever had. Therefore, I am giving him the raise.

Of course, this is entirely justified.

[edit] Related Articles

Personal tools