Talk:Theory of Evolution

From SkepticWiki

OK, big edit, adding a History section and moving it before the now-empty Discussion. epepke 29 September 2005 01:21 (GMT)

I'm not entirely happy with the organization of this page, but at this point, I think it's more important to get the words on disk and save organization for later. It should be more obvious how to reorganize the page when it is better fleshed out. epepke 30 September 2005 23:17 (GMT)

Is calling the unscientific controversies section "Illegitimate Controversies" appropriate? It seems to imply these are non controversies, which they obviously are in a scientfic sense, but in a political sense they are controversies especially if ID is included Mid 22 November 17:36 (GMT)

________________________________

And the Creationist Arguments are labelled "Specious Creationist arguments", and tucked away under "Logic".

(Meanwhile I'm not allowed to call people racists * mutters to self *)

(Actually, it's called "Specious Creationism arguments, which isn't grammatical, either.)

I think it would be a good idea to call it Common Creationist Arguments, and have it linked to from Creationism, which should be on the main page, but I don't have the technical knowhow to do this

--- Dr A