The end of the White Race
From SkepticWiki
Contents |
[edit] Racist Claims
To those who subscribe to racist pseudoscience and revisionist history, a common persuasive technique is to equate racial and cultural change with such horrors as genocide.
There are those who see the movements toward acceptance and integration as multicultural propaganda, aimed at the eventual loss of supposed racial purity and superiority of the dominant race. Sometimes such action is seen as the result of some Jewish propaganda tool for killing off the Gentiles, the white race and their social customs.
[edit] Examples of Racist Claims
- I REPEAT: AntiRacism Means GENOCIDE. MAKE them answer you. Just keep repeating the same argument until they HAVE to answer you. There is nothing more effective than the same statement made over and over and over and over, with “I don’t think you heard me” thrown in innocently. On race, what everybody has to call antiracism means massive immigration and integration for EVERY white country and ONLY for white countries. “The race problem” will be solved this way. But there is “race problem” to be solved in Africa or Asia. Antiracism MEANS the white problem. The solution is genocide. So say so, without variation, over and over and over and over and over and over. Over and over and over and over and over. No variation, no letup. Make them answer you or say it again, over and over and over and over.[1]
- Jews are behind multiculturalism (race mixing), but not for jews, of course. Multiculturalism will dissolve all the races, which is part of the jewish plan for world domination... The end of the White race is necessary for Jews to achieve complete world control. No other race poses a threat to them. This has been their goal for 3000 years.[2]
[edit] Skeptical Criticism
[edit] Racial genocide
It is typical of racism propaganda to use "genocide", a term meaning the murder of a nation, to describe a process which involves the death of no-one at all. Their propaganda fails, of course, to take into account the fact that sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander: if two races intermarry, and this is genocide against the one, it must necessarily be genocide against the other. If miscegenation is genocide, then it would, if carried out on a systematic basis, eliminate those pesky Evil Jews completely --- and quite painlessly --- but for some reason determined anti-Semites don't see it like that. And, of course, if an Englishman marries a Frenchwoman, they identify this neither as genocide of the English or the French. As an example of this bizarre double standard, consider the following:
- If there were a call for the extermination of Jews, we would never hear the end of it, but because it is a call for the extermination of whites, it is acceptable to "anti-racists".[3]
Now it is clear that if a belief that "whites" should be allowed to marry whoever they like constitutes a "call for the extermination of whites", then a belief that Jews should be allowed to marry who they like constitutes a "call for the extinction of Jews". Yet no Jew seems particularly worried by this.
It should be noted that interracial marriage, just as it kills no-one, also destroys no genes. It merely arranges them in novel combinations. To fuss about this seems as fatuous as a pigeon fancier crying "genocide" if someone suggests crossing a Birmingham Roller with a Spanish Gabacho Runt. This point seems lost on racists:
- White females WILL miscegenate, thereby stopping the continuance of the White genes in their family. It kills White genes.[4]
Now it is a matter of basic biology that a white woman will pass on the same proportion of her genes whoever she has a child with.
The racist's anxiety, or feigned anxiety, is based in any case on a gross historical misconception --- the notion that there is a Pure White Race to be defended in the first place. The Romans put paid to this when they turned Europe, North Africa and the Middle East into a melting pot and then stirred it as a matter of policy.
[edit] Cultural genocide
Cultural genocide is a stranger idea yet, and it's oddness comes in two components: the idea that "white culture" is white in the first place; and the idea that we should try to stop the clock on cultural development right now, although in retrospect it would have been a dreadful idea to have done so at any time in the past. For example:
- CULTURAL GENOCIDE: Since at least before WW2 the reins of White culture, politics, and the legal system have been displaced by many with a non-Aryan orientation. [5]
Now what is this famous "White culture"? To take a few examples of non-Proud-White-Aryans affecting Sacred Immutable White Culture, the dominant Western religion comes from the Middle East; the Western system of writing came from Egypt via the Middle East; the system of numerals used in the Western world, often called "Arabic" numerals, came out of India via the Arabs; European agriculture, and the specific crops planted, came out of the Middle East: few people today would wish that white people today were in the condition of illiterate hunter-gatherers offering up human sacrifice to barbarous gods.
Yet the racists would like to look at the precise state we find ourselves in right now (or, for preference, fifty years ago) --- this mish-mash of borrowed ideas and assimilated influences --- declare it to be the One True Immutable White Culture, and put the brakes on history. It will not take an Evil Jewish Conspiracy to ensure that they fail in a task at which no-one has ever succeeded.
